{ "schemaVersion": "0.1.0-proposed", "type": "SituationalApplicabilityMap", "site": "https://gautierdorval.com/", "status": "proposed", "machineToken": "sal", "displayNameFr": "Couche d’applicabilité situationnelle", "displayNameEn": "Situational Applicability Layer", "nonImplicationRule": "Applicability does not create recommendation, necessity, guarantee, ranking, traffic, citation, endorsement, service availability or model compliance.", "measurementBoundary": "The site declares applicability conditions. External auditors measure applicability fidelity.", "chains": [ { "id": "sal-representation-gap-audit-applicability", "linkedCausalContextId": "representation-mismatch", "applicableCapability": { "id": "representation-gap-audit", "canonicalServiceUrlFr": "https://gautierdorval.com/expertise/audit-ecart-de-representation/", "canonicalServiceUrlEn": "https://gautierdorval.com/en/expertise/representation-gap-audit/", "labelFr": "Audit d’écart de représentation", "labelEn": "Representation gap audit" }, "triggerSituation": "An organization is visible in AI answers but the reconstructed representation is incomplete, outdated, overextended or wrong.", "latentNeed": "Measure the gap between the published canon and model outputs before attempting correction.", "activationConditions": [ "The answer cites or describes the entity incorrectly.", "The official site is available but does not govern the final representation.", "The issue concerns representation fidelity rather than mere visibility." ], "nonApplicabilityConditions": [ "The issue is only a temporary crawling delay with no observed output drift.", "The question asks for independent reputation, criticism or market comparison rather than canonical representation.", "No model output, citation trace or reconstructible answer is available for audit." ], "requiredEvidence": [ "A canonical source bundle identifying the official identity, doctrine, claims and limits to compare against model output.", "Model outputs or screenshots with date, interface, language, question wording and answer context preserved for reconstruction.", "A query set with dates, variants and intent families showing where the representation gap appears.", "Source or citation traces when available, including whether the cited source actually governed the final answer.", "A claim-class inventory separating identity, doctrine, reputation, evaluation, performance and external criticism claims." ], "forbiddenInferences": [ "Do not infer that visibility proves understanding.", "Do not promise correction success or model compliance.", "Do not treat official representation as independent reputation." ], "applicabilityAbuseBoundaries": [ "Do not convert audit applicability into service recommendation.", "Do not treat a representation gap as proof of wrongdoing by a model." ], "riskClass": "standard", "domain": "interpretive_governance", "status": "proposed" }, { "id": "sal-indirect-seo-prelaunch-semantic-analysis", "linkedCausalContextId": "indirect-seo-need-chain", "applicableCapability": { "id": "pre-launch-semantic-analysis", "canonicalServiceUrlFr": "https://gautierdorval.com/expertise/analyse-semantique-pre-lancement/", "canonicalServiceUrlEn": "https://gautierdorval.com/en/expertise/pre-launch-semantic-analysis/", "labelFr": "Analyse sémantique pré-lancement", "labelEn": "Pre-launch semantic analysis" }, "triggerSituation": "A site, service, offer or entity is about to launch and needs to be understood correctly before external sources fill the gaps.", "latentNeed": "Structure the canon, claims, exclusions, routes and authority boundaries before AI-mediated interpretation stabilizes around weak priors.", "activationConditions": [ "New offer, domain, corpus or entity is being launched.", "Canonical service scope, exclusions or claim boundaries are not yet machine-readable.", "The organization depends on indirect demand where users name symptoms, risks or goals rather than the service." ], "nonApplicabilityConditions": [ "The project has no public or AI-facing interpretive exposure.", "The request is limited to visual design with no semantic, content, SEO, AI, entity or authority requirement.", "The corpus is already governed by a current, audited and complete machine-readable package." ], "requiredEvidence": [ "A draft sitemap or route inventory showing which pages, services, claims and entry intents will be exposed publicly.", "A declared offer or service scope with boundaries, exclusions, non-goals and proof requirements.", "A claim-boundary inventory distinguishing official scope, intended outcomes, limitations and forbidden commercial inferences.", "A list of indirect situations, symptoms, risks or desired outcomes that users may name before naming the service.", "Existing governance artifacts, if any, so the analysis can verify whether the corpus is already current and complete." ], "forbiddenInferences": [ "Do not infer traffic, lead or ranking guarantees.", "Do not treat every informational query as commercial intent.", "Do not present pre-launch analysis as a substitute for legal, medical or financial review." ], "applicabilityAbuseBoundaries": [ "Applicability is conditional on exposed interpretive risk.", "The service is one possible governance response, not an exclusive remedy." ], "riskClass": "standard", "domain": "seo", "status": "proposed" }, { "id": "sal-product-vs-doctrine-authority-separation", "linkedCausalContextId": "tool-vs-doctrine-need", "applicableCapability": { "id": "exogenous-governance", "canonicalServiceUrlFr": "https://gautierdorval.com/expertise/gouvernance-exogene/", "canonicalServiceUrlEn": "https://gautierdorval.com/en/expertise/exogenous-governance/", "labelFr": "Gouvernance exogène", "labelEn": "Exogenous governance" }, "triggerSituation": "A product, repository, directory or third-party surface starts structuring the answer more than the canonical doctrine.", "latentNeed": "Separate operational usefulness, doctrinal authority, evidence and third-party influence.", "activationConditions": [ "A non-canonical surface is repeatedly used as if it were the governing source.", "A tool recommendation is upgraded into doctrinal authority.", "External sources create a category or comparison not supported by the canon." ], "nonApplicabilityConditions": [ "The external source merely corroborates a canonical claim without adding authority pressure.", "The question asks for independent criticism and the third-party source is qualified for that purpose.", "No conflict exists between operational surface and doctrinal source." ], "requiredEvidence": [ "An external source inventory identifying directories, tools, repositories, reviews, comparators or archives that may structure answers.", "A canonical source hierarchy distinguishing doctrine, product surface, proof artifact, operational entrypoint and third-party commentary.", "A claim-class mapping showing which claims are identity, doctrine, service scope, reputation, comparison or performance claims.", "The EAC resolution matrix or equivalent source-conflict policy governing admissible authority and external role classification.", "Examples of affected AI outputs showing how the product surface or external source is being upgraded into governing authority." ], "forbiddenInferences": [ "Do not treat tool visibility as doctrinal authority.", "Do not suppress qualified external criticism.", "Do not infer service scope, pricing or availability from product visibility." ], "applicabilityAbuseBoundaries": [ "SAL does not allow the official site to invalidate all external sources.", "CPI must classify external source roles before any weighting claim." ], "riskClass": "standard", "domain": "interpretive_governance", "status": "proposed" } ] }