Doctrinal note: this text is meant to be read through External Authority Control (EAC), the layer that qualifies the admissibility of external authorities in interpretive reconstruction. See EAC: minimum doctrinal decisions · EAC doctrine.
This page assembles the full “interpretive governance” series. The goal is not to repeat the canon, but to provide a reading map, navigation paths, and direct access to phenomena, rules of authority, mechanisms of proof, and operating environments.
Canonical register: /definitions/.
Series map
Series A: observable phenomena
- Interpretive invisibilization: when information exists but disappears from the response
- Interpretive collision: entity fusion and synthesis hallucinations
- Interpretive capture: signal saturation and the diversion of truth
- Interpretive inertia: why corrections do not “stick”
- State drift: when AI freezes an outdated state (price, inventory, policy)
- Interpretive smoothing: why AI standardizes your thinking
Series B: applied doctrine (canon, authority, non-response)
Series C: proof and audit
Series D: environments (open web, RAG, agentic systems)
Series E: debt and sustainability
Reading paths
1) Stabilizing a brand (open web)
Start with A, then B, then C. Finish with D (open web) and E (debt + versioning).
2) Building a genuinely reliable RAG
Start with B, then C, then D (RAG). Finish with E.
3) Agentic systems (safety)
Start with B (authority boundary, non-response), then D (agentic systems), then C (trace + observability).
Going further
- Canonical register: /definitions/
- Doctrine: /doctrine/
- Frameworks: /frameworks/
- Clarifications: /clarifications/
- External Authority Control (EAC): doctrine · minimum decisions
