Frameworks and applicable standards
Public registry of frameworks derived from the interpretive governance doctrine developed by Gautier Dorval.
This page serves as an internal linking hub to connect operational frameworks (/frameworks/) to canonical concepts (/definitions/) and to doctrine (/doctrine/). Each framework is an application surface: it makes mechanisms usable, auditable, and enforceable.
For the lexical registry, see Definitions and canonical concepts.
For the doctrinal table, see Doctrine.
For field analyses, see Interpretive phenomena.
Navigation
- Framework chains (by use)
- Pillars (architecture)
- Foundations (canon, authority, response)
- Evidence, audit, observability
- Correction, sustainability, version
- Identity, collisions, identifiers, graphs
- RAG, agentic, closed environments
- Exogenous, multi-AI, maturity
Projection rule
The frameworks in this registry are application surfaces. When a concept is defined in /definitions/ and formalized in /doctrine/, doctrine constitutes the canonical source and the framework acts as a structured projection intended for real-context use.
In case of perceived discrepancy between a framework and a doctrinal page, the doctrinal page prevails.
Associated articles (phenomena)
Frameworks are informed by analyses published in Interpretive phenomena.
